20 Best Hiking Boots For Men With Wide Feet (2023 Updated)

I have purchased Ecco, New Balance, Nike Adidas, Hoka one one. Desperately looking to reduce my continual foot and leg pain. Every new pair of shoes I purchased helped a little none of them have eliminated my pain as much as OrthoFeet shoes have.

I even have 0 pain days using these shoes. I had an experience where I was wearing a different shoe for the day by the end of the day my feet and legs were killing me. I put my OrthoFeet shoes back on and immediately 80% of the pain was gone.

I also noticed on my Colorado trip to Estes Park walking on trails and rocky roads they work great kept the pain away. Keep up the good work on the shoes. FYI I now have 2 pairs of the Ranger shoes think about buying a third pair for dress shoes.

I forgot to mention how easy they are to put on with the zip backs love that feature.

These shoes changed my thoughts on footwear entirely. They’re so comfortable and actually feel more stable than anything I’ve ever worn. If I had to describe it I would say your feet sit IN the shoes instead of ON the shoes.

They feel wider and more stable at the base. Its hard to describe but once you put them on very easy to understand. I broke the zipper tab off one the first shoes I ordered. I called the number that google provided me while driving across town and my call was immediately answered a girl who looked up my order by using my phone number and had a new pair of shes sent out by the time I reached my next stop.

Now that’s service! I am so impressed by this company that I tell everyone who will listen to try these shoes out, they will change your whole outlook on shoes and restore your faith in the term customer service!.

I bought these about a week before we went on a family vacation. Going to a few state parks for hiking and waterfalls. I expected OK not great. I need a lot of arch support, after a few hours on my feet I’m usually ready for a rest because of my aching feet and legs.

I’m not sure how they do it but it feels like I’m walking bare footed, yet enough support my feet haven’t hurt or gotten sore at all. We hiked 3 or 4 miles the first day, up and down hills with no issues at all.

We hiked about 3 miles the second day and 2 the last day and never any problems or soreness whatsoever. I really like the zippers on the back, much easier to get on and off. After we got back home I cleaned them up and wore them to Church, they are way more comfortable than my “Church shoes”.

Overall best shoes I’ve had in years!!.

I just received them a little over a week ago so I have only worn them a few times, with that being said though even in the snow here in New York at 28 degrees my feet stayed warm and dry. I did notice where most footwear you slip and slide a lot on packed snow and ice.

I can say with these hikers they did grip very well and another point they are really light so it makes it easier to hike further without fatigue.

I didn’t expect alot for $40+, however i’m very pleased with the construction of these shoes. It was a real bonus to get an extra pair of laces also. Those are usually the first to go on my work shoes.

FITS WELL. SEEMS VERY DURABLE. TIME WILL TELL. SENT WITH EXTRA PAIR OF LASES TELLS ME THAT NORTIV CARES ABOUT THEIR PRODUCT.

Finally a shoe that fits. I’ve tried 4-5 brands of hiker’s for daughter so nice she was about 12 and she always complained the didn’t feet right. Now 19, she is moving to AK, so having quality is a priority.

We went to sporting store, again, and tried on 7-8 pairs and a Columbia pair fit, but what was in stock was more a hunting boot. but we had a size and, being older, she realized that it was the arch that did not fit in keen, vasques, rocky or the Walmart hikers.

We ordered these and after keeping them on 10 minutes, she asked if she could wear them all the time. THAT is the statement that says it all. Her everyday foot wear has be converse all these years, and didn’t enjoy hiking or hunting near as much in other hikers because her feet hurt, and she always opted to wear her converse, which have limitations when hiking on uneven rocky terrain.

I can’t tell you how happy we are that after 7 years, we finally found a hiker that fits comfortably and has all day comfort. I did add silicone repellant to the fabric weave area and seal oil to the boot leather, as stated these are going to be daily wear in AK.

And because they are on sale, I’m ordering a second pair for a Christmas present.

I love these boots. I find they fit and feel like good quality tennis shoes. I have 3 pairs because they fit well and are comfortable and wear much better than tennis shoes. I should mention though as someone else pointed out, if you do not use the top lace guides push them closed with pliers!! This is very important!! I also was tripped by the loop of the lace on the right foot catching in the eye on the inside of the left boot.

(I do not use the top lace guides) I slip my feet into my boots without lacing each time so I have them loose at the ankle. I do not need the ankle support, but I like that they are tall for keeping water out of the boot and ankle protection.

I waterproof them with silicone to protect them and they have always kept my feet dry in wet environments. I have a pair of 7. 5 to wear with light weight socks in the summer. That is what size I wear in tennis shoes.

I also have a pair of 8. 5 to wear with medium socks. I recently bought a pair of 9’s to wear with really heavy socks. I do replace the stock insoles with more padded ones and they fit fine. I have somewhat wide feet and often purchase wide shoes, but the regular width on these fits me fine.

Live in Oregon, needed a decent waterproof winter boot, for everyday running around town or play, preferably warm enough to handle a few snow days. The snow seems to be done this winter so I haven’t checked them out in that element but these definitely work in rain, waterproof and grip well.

I wish these were a bit warmer which is why I didn’t give 5 stars, that and the part above the ankle is a bit stiff. But, these do feel like a tennis shoe, light, comfortable enough for long day wear despite my arthritic toes and these look really cool – even in this teal surprisingly.

I got that color because it was on clearance and thought they’d be loud but no! It’s darker than the picture. I wear a size 9 and after reading reviews, bought size 9 Wide. Fits fine with room for a thicker sock.

For the price, I think you really get a great bang for your buck.

My goddaughter in New York recommended these boots after reading very good reviews about them knowing I was struggling to choose new ones. The actual boot is very comfortable and fits well. I was told by a podiatrist to always buy a size larger in a trainer and walking boot so I purchased a 5 although my normal shoe size is 4.

On my second wearing I got a blister on my ankle above my heal, I have very sensitive feet so wasn’t surprised, the ankle cuffs are a little hard. I did however read a review that advised wearers to watch a YouTube video on how to tie laces properly on walking boots.

I found a Trekkit video and was amazed at how differently they advise how to tie laces than I tie mine. I’m waiting for my blister to heal before trying this technique but I’m confident that it will make a big difference.

Overall I think the boots are comfortable, subject to more breaking in, they look good and seem to be waterproof as I walked in puddles without a problem. 10 out of 10 after a few more wears I’m confident.

I am on my third pair of these, and considering buying a fourth in the absence of a better option for the price. I walk a 5 kilometers (3. 1 miles) in 43 -44 minutes, twice a day, summer and winter, on paved sidewalks and gravel paths or on the snow above.

-35C with the wind today, and my feet were comfortable. Good cushion for impact for my application, but a bit thin under the ball for activity on rocky ground, or for digging a garden. Padded cuff keeps the snow out, except for very deep snow — and make for a poor fit with some pants cuffs.

Treads last a year for me, which is satisfactory for the price in my mind. Interior fabric wears through at the toe about the same time. Inner toe cap is plastic, which does not breathe, and cracks, which might becomes a greater friction point if it now splinters.

I note the image on Cabela’s shows the speed hooks each have two anchor points, but this is not what I have received and is not what I see on the Timberland site. Mine have one anchor point, and one of the hooks on a earlier pair pulled out under light use.

I cobbled a fix for it so got my year of use out of it. Two anchor point would for sure be better. By measure on one of the old metal foot scales, my size is 13+3/4, so a size 14 practically speaking.

I found the size 14 in the Flume was too small, which may be due to the fact that I wear heavy wool socks, always. The size 15 is a little bit loose, which I greatly prefer over a little bit tight. Overall, these boots are “Satisfactory”.

Not outstanding. Not great. But most certainly not “BAD”. With size 14 or 15, “Satisfactory” meets my needs and I am glad to have them. Relatively good value for the price.

I ordered these boots to replace a pair of worn out 1994 Timberland Euro Style Hiking Boots which I sent back to Timberland. The new boots arrived with 5 calendar days of my order. I’ve worn them for a week now, and they are breaking in nicely.

The tread gives great traction, and the boot fits comfortably on my foot with a thin or medium pair of hiking socks. They are easy to pull on and lace up, and look good while wearing either long pants or shorts.

Haven’t had any wet conditions to test their waterproofing, but I like the way the tongue is connected to the boot so that no water can enter from the lacing area. The ankle support was tight at first, but is molding to my leg more and more with each wearing.

I would recommend these boots to everyone. Here’s to another 28 years trekking around the world.

I was almost going to take away one star from my review due to the fact that these boots are not the best looking, but ultimately decided that they are hiking boots, and not necessarily meant to be good looking.

They are more streamline and less bulky than another hiking boots which I like. I’ve done a couple of muddy, wet mountains in them, and they gave me great ankle support and kept my feet warm and dry.

Ultimately I added red laces which did improve the overall look of the boots. There was no major breaking in needed, but there was a small bit of rubbing above the ankle on my first hike. I had been wearing trail runners in the past so I wasn’t used to having some thing up over my ankle.

By the second hike It didn’t bother me at all and I was so grateful for the added ankle support. I would highly recommend these boots!.

Pros: Very comfortable. Waterproof, breathable. Cons: Lace Material: Wont stayed tied beyond about 200 yards, whether still hooked or not (See below). Tongue too narrow at the top, won’t stay behind the side flaps where the top hooks are, OR, the top sides of the opening for the tongue are too skimpy to cover the tongue and hold it in place.

Bottom line: blocks top hooks making it difficult to engage the laces. Hooks: a bit small. Simple flexing of the boot during walking will disengage the lace from the hook. Sole: comes unglued with little wear.

Order at least a full size up! I wear a Women’s 8 X-X-W, but based on many reviews stating a tight fit, took the chance that the Men’s 8 X-X-W might work– it does! Sturdy, padded ankle. Waterproof in the rain.

Excellent traction on wet leaves and grass. Not too heavy. Been wearing off-and-on for about a month; mostly city, no serious trails. One drawback is the area where tongue attaches to upper, behind the toes– it’s rigid and thick; digs into the top of my foot a bit.

I’ll continue breaking them in, and trying different insoles. (Propet makes good shoes, but their insoles are thin and flat, so I suggest you plan ahead to replace the factory inserts with something right for you.

).

I typically buy men’s boots because need a wide width. Bought these in 11 3E (extra wide). The foot/toe width was perfect, the ankle was way too narrow and coverage gapped. Though maybe my husband could wear, but they were too loose for him.

He really liked the style though, so exchanged them for the D width and he loves them. So, if you don’t have large ankles like me these should work perfect. In the future, I wish the ankle circumference would be include in the description.

I have used these for a few of my normal hikes that have good altitude change and are a mix of rock, roots, dirt and asphalt. I found that on the dirt sections of the trails the shoes work just fine, and I don’t think about my boots at all during these times.

That’s what I want when I am hiking, just to focus on the trail and my surroundings, and not worry about my gear. On one of my hikes after some rain I found these boots struggled with any of the rocks or roots.

I found that if I didn’t concentrate on my footing 100% then the boots would slip from time to time on push off. The trails weren’t soaked, but they were damp, and the mud seemed to collect in the treading which could have lead to some of the slippage.

I found that the ankle support was great in these though, and the cushioning around the tongue and ankle was just as good as other hiking boots I have tried. On the asphalt surfaces between trails I found the boots weren’t as cushioned as I would have liked.

My 3 year old La Sportiva GTX boots are very comfortable in comparison, and I found the Moab’s to be a little stiff and flat while not on dirt or woodchip trails. I think for longer hikes this boot could boarder on uncomfortable for my feet, but for quick hikes in dry conditions I think they are a perfectly capable boot.

First, they’re pretty neutral visually, which I like, and I find the looks just right for any occasion. Not too sporty looking, which is a plus in my opinion. The materials seem durable and the quality is very appropriate for the price.

I usually wear 10 us shoes, and with thick winter socks, I sized up to 11us to get tje right size. Having wide feet, the Keen were recommended as apparently most of their range is a bit wider than most.

Only two points so far prohibited me from giving 5 stars : they could be a bit higher on the leg (or have a higher version), and the soles, while comfortable, could be a bit softer to help with long winter walks.

Those arr small issues though, and I would buy them again if they were lost/stolen. For the price, they seem on par or above competitors when considering the build quality and materials.

I have wide feet and I walk everywhere. Many shoes don’t fit well. These shoes have a very wide toe box and the sole is very grippy – feels like I need to put in a separate insole. Waterproof so far – keep feet dry when it’s raining.

Not the best looking shoes but well-made. A lot of toe protection, would work well for hiking and rocky terrain.

I got these when they first came out in August because they were light and I like Keen’s sandals. i got them for a Canada/Montana hunting trip which I am now on. I carefully broke them in, which was important as they were a bit tight around the ankles.

They have been great! Very easy to get into, too.

This is my fourth pair of Lowa hiking boots, third in this style, and as always they are perfect and comfy right out of the box with no break-in time required. I wear a 7. 5 in shoes and that’s what I always get for these boots as well.

My feet are on the narrower side and slightly long, with a high arch/instep. Some brands are too wide and too short for me, but Lowas are always just right. Lightweight but warm and supportive, they are great all year round, including most of our cold, wet Michigan winters.

I switch to taller boots when the snow cover is more than ankle deep, but these are great for all the rest of the time. I wear them pretty much every day for hikes in the woods with my dogs, and they hold up pretty well.

However they don’t seem to last quite as long as the Bora model from a few years ago (my first Lowas). Each time, within a year, the toes on my two previous pairs of Renegades developed cracks and started to come apart, which makes them pretty much useless unless the weather is warm and dry, which this is Michigan so forget it.

Pretty disappointing for such an expensive boot, as I’d definitely rather not have to replace them annually after wearing them for an hour or two a day in pretty non-punishing conditions. Compare that to my Boras which lasted me a good couple of years of regular use including several backcountry trips on rough terrain in Arizona, including the Grand Canyon.

Still, I have yet to find anything else as comfortable or that meets my needs as well as these. The only other issue is that the laces come loose as I walk unless I double-tie them, which is annoying to have to do and makes it impossible to adjust the instep and ankle to different degrees of tightness (as previous pairs have enabled).

The bottom of the three speedhooks does not hold them tightly enough, so if you like your fit looser at the instep and tighter around the ankle (which I do), forget it, because that hook won’t hold it firmly enough to allow this and eventually the looseness will work itself all the way up until you have no ankle support whatsoever and you’ll have to stop and fuss with it, which is annoying.

I’ve owned the Lowa Renegade since the early 2000’s and the model hasn’t changed much in design and comfort. I did transition to the wide model since it came out, my wide feet have a hard time finding comfortable boots.

The Renegade has taken me all over the world, and for the past 6 years, I’ve been wearing it almost every day. It’s an exceptionally comfortable boot from day one. It’s reasonably light, waterproof and great for most weather, apart from temps dropping below -10C.

I exclusively wear Darn Tough mid socks, medium weight, which are an excellent, blister-free combo. I’ve owned Hanwag, Salomon, Salewa, TNF, and a bunch of other boot brands, but keep coming back to this boot.

I also wear the Renegade Wide Low shoe, which has a slightly different cut but same fit and seems to have a stiffer sole. In comparison, the Renegade GTX is the light, day hike / weekend warrior boot.

For longer treks, especially mountain terrain, I prefer the Lowa Camino GTX Wide. Much stiffer, slightly less wide (in wide model, I use a boot stretcher to widen it, takes a few days/weeks). The Camino is excellent, but heavier.

My Lowa Tibet is my long distance boot for multi week mountain hikes. In terms of width, the Renegade feels the widest of the Renegade, Camino & Tibet trio. In terms of stability and comfort and micro adjustability , the Camino is a winner.

Both the Tibet & Camino have removable soles, whereas the Renegade GTX doesn’t and it bums me out. On the other hand, the rubber of the Renegade wears out at a similar pace than the stitching. I go through a pair of Renegades in about 3 years / 600-700 days of wear.

Stitching usually starts failing on the widest part of my feet due to expansion when putting weight on the shoe. Totally worth their high price tag, though, and I highly recommend this boot more than any boot I’ve ever owned.

My only wishes were that Lowa would make other colors of the Wide model and that the soles would be replaceable. The inner soles are useless, and meant to be customized. I choose “Sole” insoles in wide medium tick model.

I usually wear size 9. 5 in Salomon, TNF, Nike, Altras and Saucony and also wear the Renegade wide in size 9. 5. Happy hiking!.

I normally don’t write negative reviews. but I think these should come with a warning. This is my third pair of hiking boots, I thought I would give a more expensive brand a try since I hike every weekend.

I have a pair of Columbia’s that had zero break in time, I had a pair of cheap Amazon $50 foxellis that were fantastic and crazy comfy, zero break in time, never one blister. These left horrible blisters on the back of both ankles within 2 miles of my hike.

There is a bump on the heel inside the shoe, and because the shoe is so stiff you cannot stop it from rubbing even with Band-Aids and tape. Also, because they are so stiff you constantly have to stop and tighten up the ankle when going uphill.

There is nothing worse than having a gear failure so bad that you cannot finish your hike. And when I only have weekends to enjoy them, these boots made me very angry when I realized I had to turn around.

Returned them. Horrible.

I love pretty much everything about these boots. Other hiking boots I’ve tried in this price range include Salomon X-Ultra 4 Mid GTX, X-Ultra 3 Mid GTX, various Merrell hiking boots and shoes, and The North Face waterproof hiking boots.

The Oboz Bridger Mid B-Dry blow them ALL out of the water in terms of quality of materials, worksmanship, and especially durability. These boots have served me well for about a year now and could easily last another couple of years.

I am a landscaper by trade and wear these to work five days a week, and often for walks/hikes on the weekend. They’ve held up extremely well to my heavy usage. I’m telling you, both pairs of Salomon boots I owned fell apart faster than I’d expect a pair of Wal Mart boots to do the same.

These Oboz boots are different. More comprehensive review below. The Oboz Bridger Mid B-Dry are made from quality materials, including leather with high-durability rubber in key places. They are plenty comfortable while also being HIGHLY supportive.

Immediately upon trying them I could tell they were a lot sturdier and more supportive than all of the others I’d tried up to that point. The insole felt high-quality by comparison. These boots are TRULY waterproof (within reason) while still being breathable enough for hot summer days in the high desert.

The rubber wrapped around the toe area and heel area of the boots seems to have done a ton to make these boots last longer. The sole of the boot might look strange at first glance, but I’ve found it a great and versatile sole shape.

I’ve worn these on all terrains in all weather while doing landscaping work. I’ve worn these on hot days, in torrential downpours, and also all throughout cold winters with heavy snowfall and ice. Somehow they manage to be breathable enough in summer and warm enough in winter with proper socks, and are still effectively waterproof.

In summary, if you are looking for possibly the best combination of quality, comfort, support, and durability in a hiking boot under $200: these are very likely the best value waterproof hiking boot out there.

Working as a landscaper is one of the best stress tests for a boot, and this one excelled. IMPORTANT NOTE: these absolutely run one-half size small. I’m normally a size 11, I ordered these in a size 11.

5 and it is perfect.

My first Oboz purchase (Bridger Premium Mid Waterproof HB); spur of the moment impulse/forced. I wouldn’t NORMALLY wear a Hiking Boot to work however this specific boot touched every point I look for in a work boot: Waterproof (NOT resistant, massive difference), Vibram sole, an anatomically designed SUPPORTIVE insert (NOT a flimsy piece of foam found in 98% of performance footwear), insulated and aesthetically pleasing.

If you’re reading this review you want to immediately call me out because the Bridger Features imply the boot is NOT insulated or a 2 out of 10, ten being highest insulation. The inside is lined in leather and VERY plush.

I’ve been wearing Woolrich and Smartwool crew socks, nothing technical, just the basic crew’s. Temps have been -10f to 40 most of Jan/Feb and my feet have yet to feel cold (I’m outside from 4am to 9am about 5 days a week).

I treated them with Apple Brand Garde Rain & Stain Water Repellent and so far they’re holding up brilliant. The boot itself feels and looks very well made. I do have higher arches and the premium inserts (I didn’t have to pay $50 extra) feel fantastic.

The first 3 days I felt the area around my ankles was a little stiff however not uncomfortable, otherwise the boot is ready to go right out of the box. Sizing is SPOT on, this was my biggest concern as boots tend to feel cramped especially in the toe box.

I’m a true 12 regular in most Nike and Hoka… the Bridger sizing does NOT disappoint. I NEVER give a product 5 stars as there’s always room for improvement, but I honestly can’t find anything wrong with them.

Maybe an additional set of laces in dark maroon or navy, but now I’m just being cheap and nitpicking. Are they worth $210? So far they’re worth every penny. Let’s see how long they hold up, that’s the REAL challenge any pair of footwear has….

to be continued.

So far, I’ve put about 30 miles on the Oboz Bridgers, and I also have a pair of Keen Durands with 200ish miles on them (along with a graveyard of worn out boots from other manufacturers). This review will contrast the two to highlight what I feel are shortcomings with the Bridger.

I bought the Oboz based on near-universal praise (I like to have two pairs of boots and had recently retired a pair of $95 Propets that performed admirably above their station). However, in almost every performance measure, I find the Oboz inferior to the Keen Durands.

Fit: These Bridgers are the narrowest “wide width” boots I’ve worn, though they are broken in now and have loosened a bit. Some describe them favorably as “snug. ” I see them as too tight laterally for my feet to get any airflow.

Keens, as everyone knows, are the roomiest boots out there for people like me who have duck feet. The Oboz are fine lengthwise, FWIW. Comfort: If you’re one of those hikers who like “feedback,” which I interpret as being able to feel the trail textures underfoot, you might enjoy these Oboz boots.

To me, they don’t offer enough protection. I feel every rock I step on, and once I hit mile five of a mountain hike, my feet start to feel banged up. The Durands, after 200 miles, are still quite comfy and provide a good barrier against trail hazards on long hikes.

Traction: I’m disappointed with the traction I get from the Oboz. My debut hike began with a fairly gentle uphill slope on hard-packed dirt that was damp (not muddy) from an overnight rain. The boots slipped out a couple times as the pitch increased.

The treads pack mud as well. If rocky terrain is slightly damp, I lose confidence with their grip. By contrast, even with 200 miles of wear, the Keens haven’t lost any gripping power. There’s one area in which the Oboz perform better, and that’s toe protection going downhill.

The flat(ish) toe box and extra roominess of the Keens can be a drawback on a sleep downhill slope, as the foot tends to slide forward a bit. All that said, the Oboz do seem to be a well-made boot. I just don’t think they’re ideal for the rocky or rainy environments I hike in.

I’d like to try them on a cool-weather desert hike or one of those gravelly coastal trails in Italy.

I am a regular user of the X Ultra mid boots, having worn out two pairs each of the X Ultra 2 and X Ultra 3. Note that this review applies to the biggest available size (UK 13. 5, EUR 49 1/3, USA 14), so it may not be fully applicable to smaller sizes.

I have also worn these boots for several months, and they are probably approaching the mid point of their useful life by looking at their soles, so I believe I can provide a good assessment. In my opinion the 4th iteration of the X Ultra is a major step backwards from the excellent previous versions.

The changes seem to be related to the significant weight reduction (488 gr per boot versus 590 for the X Ultra 3), which is noticeable. However, the cost of this weight reduction is huge: 1. There is significantly less cushioning around the ankle, and the boot is also approximately one finger lower.

I continue to notice a slight friction around the ankles on every hike, although less as time goes on. In the first few hikes I stopped several times because of this, and once I even had to put some tissue to increase the cushioning.

To me this makes no sense, as it a significant inconvenience just to lose a few grams. 2. I have to stop and tighten my laces at least twice in every hike, as otherwise the fitting becomes loose. This is new to me and had never happened before.

I ignore the reason but maybe the material has some elasticity in it. Huge inconvenience. 3. The boot seems to have much less torsion resistance than previous versions. I hike in a very stony area, and at least once every day this causes slight ankle twists when placing the boot heel on a stone.

Avoiding this is the reason why I wear mid boots instead of regular shoes, and again seems to be the result of saving a few grams. Overall very disappointed with these boots to the point where I have looked and successfully acquired two more pairs of version 3.

I can not recommend version 4 to any one and I will certainly be very cautious when a (hopefully improved) version 5 comes out. Version 3 was an excellent product, this one is not.

Please keep in mind that I have never used the X Ultra 3’s, so my review is not biased. I am an avid backpacker and have worn many boots in my life. Also keep in mind that I had two REI employees ensure that I was purchasing the right size.

These, by far, are not only the most expensive but also the worst pair of boots that I have ever dawned upon my feet. My Adidas Terrex Swift R2’s that I loved finally died out on me and I decided to splurge on a new set of boots from a “quality” brand.

Salomon’s Ultra 3’s have great reviews, so I figured the new 4’s would be even better. This was not the case. It seems Salomon missed the mark on the skew between trail runner and hiking boot with these, making them not only useless, but actively harmful to users.

I took these on a 30 mile backpacking trip on Isle Royal and now have medical bills to pay directly because of these boots because they caused intense blistering, bruising of my feet, my toe nails are turning purple and will likely fall off, and of course I slipped multiple times on easy terrain due to lack of grip.

Here is a quick summary: Comfort: This is subjective to my feet, but these were a terrible fit. I do not have wide feet, but these run so narrow that they crushed my feet and damaged my nail beds on my long hike.

Also manufacturing quality is low as the right show had a completely different shape, ridges, and size than the left shoe causing uneven wear. The bottoms are paper thin, expect to feel every pebble under your foot.

Support: There is none. The point of a mid cut is to offer stability. These boots have a convenient cutout specifically around where your ankles end up when you are hiking downhill and need stability the most.

The bottom of the shoe is very flexible and unstable. Also the upper of the shoe is very flexible. This results in your foot warping the upper when planted on any incline, and sliding off the sole of the shoe regardless of how tight you tie them.

Grip: I have slipped total of four times in my hiking career. Three of those times were during the 30 miles I hiked with these boots on. The will slip on dry rock, wet rock, roots, dirt, and even mud.

The last eight miles of my hike I completed in my crocs because I could no longer handle the damage the boots were causing to my feet and the crocs had measurably better grip and stability. Durability: Waterproofing failed after about ten miles.

At the end of the 30 miles, noticeable snags int the stitching appeared. The lugs also seemed slightly worn which is surprising since they didn’t grip anything to begin with. Conclusion: I have no idea how it is possible to create a shoe that is tight enough in the forefoot to crush your toes but loose enough in the heel to shred your heels.

This shoe offers the lack of support and protection of a boot while also lacking the flexibility, comfort, and freedom of a trail runner. Truly the worst of both worlds. Again, I cannot imagine a foot type or activity scenario that these would be ideal for.

I’m deeply disappointed that Salomon has opted for perceived style rather than function and that their manufacturing quality has dropped so intensely. I use their products for my cross country skiing antics but will likely be swapping to a quality brand after this experience.

Overall, the shoes perform well for their intended use as light hiking boots. They’re well supported for their light weight, but not something I would use for extended backpacking. I end up doing some walking on concrete (in wet conditions) to get to many of the hikes I take these on, and they do not have sufficient padding to be comfortable on pavement.

Given that pavement is not what they’re built for, I’m not dinging them for that. Other shoes do offer better padding though. The tread on the bottom has fantastic grip, and has served me well in wet, dry, and dusty scrambling conditions.

That said, it does seem to be wearing through a bit more quickly than I’d like for a $150+ shoe. This may seem superficial, but I am really disappointed with the colors. I have wide feet. Not extremely wide, but wide enough that for Salomons, I usually need to pick up the wide-specific model.

I love the look of many Salomon shoe, but for some reason, these guys always pick the blandest ones for the wide fit! I feel like we’re being punished for having wide feet, and there ain’t a darn thing I can do about it! I think the Green Gables color on the X 4 Ultra Mid is one of the best looking hiking shoes in the game, and I actually purchased one originally.

Of course, it didn’t fit because it was far too narrow, so I was consigned to the boring black shoe bin. I’ve been wearing these shoes for three months and, overall, they perform well for light hikers.

They have fantastic grip and effective waterproofing, but durability remains an open question, and styles lost some major points (especially knowing how much Salomon is capable of). Would I buy again? Frankly, I hope not to.

I loved my X Ultra 3 Mid Wide GTX, and I’d like to see a version 5 or 4. 1 that brings better colors, more durability throughout, and specifically longer-lasting lugs/treads underfoot. The new lacing system is good, and I’d like to see it stick around.

If all that materialized (and I mean please, please bring us that Green Gables in wide!), then yes, count me in for another round after the next update. If you’re stuck with the version 4 as is, I’d skip it and come back next year.

Got my new boots two weeks ago, and have used them for work doing construction. They are lighter than I would have thought, and comfortable all day on my feet. They clean up exactly as reported in another review.

My boots loaded with sheetrock dust after working, returned to brand new with just a rinse with the hose. I have been wearing Rocky hunting boots for over 20 years with no disappointment. These are the same great quality.

Great boots, great price, fast delivery, recommended to anyone that has had any trouble with any boots in the past. Will reorder again when needed. Thanks Rocky!.

These were not what I hoped. They have a totally flat sole that might be good for a factory worker but are not the hiking boots style of rocky I do like. Had to return them. And that is a whole other disappointing story.

The customer service was not at all on. I had to ask twice for a return authorization and then another request to get the shipping label. Don’t get me wrong. I love rocky boots. They are made well. But choose the style that suits you and have patience with the return process.

I haven’t gotten my credit yet. But purchased the endeavor point boot I totally love!!.

Only had them couple weeks. Soft leather, nice looking boot. Wide loose fit but comfy. They still need some break in. So far so good. I did tear the tongue on one boot already but I’ll take the blame on that.

I haven’t been able to keep them on all day yet but hope they come around soon. My first pair of Rocky so I’m looking at every aspect before I’d recommend.

I got these boots in March, they had everything I was looking for. Sewn-in toe cap, minimal seams, tough leather construction, and goretex waterproofing. But excellent build quality means nothing if they don’t fit well.

Pros: These boots have some of the best build quality I’ve seen in a market saturated by lightweight hikers and trail runners. The full grain leather with minimal seams is easy to clean and re-treat the waterproofing, and the soles held up well to 100+ miles of rocky trails all over Colorado, Wyoming, and California.

Cons: Unfortunately these boots just weren’t for me. The first 30 miles or so would give me blisters on my left pinky toe. I resorted to sock liners under my Darn Tough socks which helped a bit and eventually the blisters went away.

Even though the blisters were gone, my pinky toes and big toe still felt rubbing and pain. The rubbing is caused by the seam where the plastic toe cap connects with the leather. If you stick your hand inside the boot you can feel the edge of the plastic toe cap.

This was not immediately apparent until after the first few hikes I did in them and I figured it was something that would have gotten better as I wore the boots more. Since the plastic toe caps won’t stretch and conform to your foot, the pain didn’t get any better as the rest of the boot got worn in.

Unfortunately this seems to be a rather common complaint about the St Elias. If Vasque can find a way to correct this, then this boot would be perfect. To summarize, the boot is built like a tank, between the sewn-in plastic toe cap, goretex construction, the one piece full grain leather, and the burly soles and cushioning.

I really wanted to like them as they had every feature I was looking for. But the pain caused by the toe cap seam got to be frustrating especially after having worn the boots for 100+ miles to break them in.

So unfortunately they went back to REI. Hopefully another adventurer will have better luck with them than I did.

I have worn these boots for 2 seasons of very heavy use and they are wonderful. I won’t comment on the fit or comfort because that depends on who is wearing the boots. The soles are very grippy on all terrain that I’ve encountered including a few icy and snowy hands on scrambles.

They also have good traction on wet rock. The waterproofing has been very good, I’ve never had any issues. They don’t breath since they are gortex + leather (no surprise there), but I’ve backpacked and hiked comfortably in upper 20’s C and low 30 C temperature and was still comfortable.

If you are hiking in hot weather with these it is a good idea to air your feet out every once in a while and wear wool socks because they will absorb more sweat without feeling soaked. The leather is very nice quality and If you take care of it with wax (I make my own beeswax/olive oil mixture then use a blow dryer to melt the wax into the leather) it will have extra water resistance and last a very long time.

The rubber toecap is a good feature but I would’ve liked to have seen it over molded as I think this would make it more robust but I have not had any issues so that is just nit picking. Lastly, the metal hardware used for the laces is very robust and will last a very long time (a feature I look for in good boots.

Overall these boots have been a lot kinder to me than I have been to them. They have many battle scars and gashes from bushwhacking and scrambling yet they have still been very forgiving and continue to serve me well.

I just replaced a 3rd generation pair of Salomon Quest 4D boots with the St. Elias, and so far these are better boots in every way. I can’t comment on durability yet as I’ve only used them on 4 hikes, but they do seem very well made.

While the Salomons were good boots, the St. Elias is more comfortable and has better traction on every surface, dry, wet, gravel, mud, snow, etc. Fit: I’m a size 10 in just about every type of athletic and casual shoe, but I size down to 9.

5 in Red Wing boots, and size up for Scarpa boots (43. 5 EU for the Zen Pros, 44 EU for the Zodiacs and Ribelles). The St. Elias in size 10 is perfect for me, with enough room in the toes. I don’t have a wide foot per se, but I’m on the wide side of a regular width foot, and my toes don’t taper as much as most guys feet seem to do; narrow boots do not fit me well and these are fine.

I wear the Smartwool Performance Hike Light Crew socks (old version was the Smartwool PhD Outdoor Light Crew) which have light cushioning. Break-in: I’ve read some reviews that say there is no break-in period, but that was not my experience.

They were a little stiff and felt a tad snug around my midfoot on my first couple of hikes. I even had a blister after my first short hike (~4 miles), but I’m not sure if it was because of the stiff leather, or because I had tied them too tight.

On the next couple of hike, I was still getting a couple of hot spots where the toe cap meets the leather, but I was able to alleviate those by loosening the lacing over the top of my foot. Once I learned not to overtighten the laces, I was surprised at how well these boots hold my foot in place, even going downhill or sidehilling, with absolutely no pressure points.

Waterproofing: Yes, they have Gore-Tex, and yes, the first time I wore them, I stepped in a stream and the water literally just beaded up and rolled off. They are waterproof out of the box. However, after walking through rocky terrain and plunge stepping through snow, whatever the leather is treated with was visibly rubbing off, and the leather was already absorbing water.

If you only hike on manicured trails and step through an occasional stream every now and then, the leather treatment may last longer, but keep in mind that Gore-Tex doesn’t protect the leather. Protecting the leather, on the other hand, will help to protect the Gore-Tex membrane.

So, after breaking these in on 3 hikes, I cleaned them well, took the extra step of sealing around the outsole with GearAid Aquaseal, and then applied a couple thin coats of Obenauf’s LP. I subsequently took them on a snow scramble and was very happy with the water repellency.

I really appreciate how these boots have minimal seams and stitching, which means less potential points of failure for water to find it’s way through. Comfort: These boots are very supportive without feeling rigid (once you break them in past the initial stiffness) and Vasque puts a very nice insole in there.

I did a fairly strenuous 9 mile RT hike with about a mile of elevation gain, through sustained steep forest and snow and I was tired at the end of the day but my feet were not. The Salomon Quests might feel a little more nimble because the sole assembly is slightly softer and thinner, but the St Elias really makes up for that with better traction and protection.

If you’re kicking steps in snow or up forested hillsides, you’ll appreciate the slightly stiffer, chunkier sole with a solid toe cap. These boots do run on the warm side, like most Gore-Tex boots, and if your feet tend to sweat then I don’t recommend them for mid-summer backpacking but they are not as warm as the Salomon Quest.

These are perfect for shoulder season, and will work just fine for some winter conditions too, as long as it’s not too cold (maybe don’t go below 25F?) and you aren’t overnighting or doing anything technical.

I recently bought a pair of these boots. I am an experienced hiker and was looking for a durable, well made boot. I trusted Vasque as I have had several beloved pairs of hiking boots in the past. The sizing was correct and fit well when trying on.

This boot ends above the ankle which is where the problems begin for me. On the trail, the upper is stiff and uncomfortable and lacing differently has not helped. Loosening causes the top of the boot to rub and flop against my leg.

More secure (not tight) lacing causes pain at ankles and top of foot just below the ankle. Also, the sides of the ankle support push my feet medially on weight bearing resulting in pronation. This is despite a firm insert I wear for plantar fasciatis.

The back of the support pushes my achilles going downhill making descending awkward. The soles did grip wet rocks well. I have about 15 hours in these including two moderate, 3 mile hikes. My ankles and tops of feet hurt after my hike yesterday.

Not sure I want to tolerate more breaking in. I don’t think these are going to work for me. Disappointing. Back to the search.

This is not a review of how a boot felt in the store or walking around a little bit. This a a review of how this boot held up being used for what it was made for. Bought a pair several years ago. Loved them at first.

after a while of using, the sole started getting lumps in the front where the show bends. I thought maybe it was must that pair, so i bought another pair before a hiking trip. New ones were fantastic.

There boots are no where near being worn out. That actually don’t look worn at all. Now having the same issue. There is a sharp rise/limp in the front sole of the boot where it bends. I’ve changed the liners but the lump is still felt.

I even tried beating the lump down with a sledge hammer, no luck. There boots are going into the trash and I will never buy this brand again. A name brand boot like this should last and feel good until it at least looks very worn.

Extremely limited and grossly deficient ventilation. Sock was drenched with sweat inside of an hour on a simple, flat day hike to break them in along Lake Tahoe. Have worn earlier models such as the 7466 for years.

I asked about breathability when buying it and the clueless sales person assured me it was fine. It is terrible. Never had blisters or breathability problems with earlier models; sure, had toe rubber separate but patched together with shoe goo; and the most recent one had the sole wear out in two years but at least they were hiking boots.

this new one is a blister boot. And yes, tried replacing socks every 45 minutes.

No doubt the shoes are of great build but when I order on Aug 2022, I at least expect I should get a fresh stock. In my case my boots are almost 3 years old, i e. 2019 manufactured. Which is quiet a shelf life.

Though it comes with a warranty and all, I doubt how capable these will be with its waterproof USP. Many mfg/ used like marks/ creases on leather as well. Very disappointed with ‘online’ convenience of Decathlon.

Physical exchange is not available at any store if purchased online. Only have to return and get refund then again buy it. My size is UK47 which is generally not available at any local stores. And If I buy again online, there is no guarantee that I will be getting fresh/ unused / brand new product which costs 8k.

I am dissatisfied with Decathlon’s trekking shoes for the second time. The last ones broke on the their very first hike ‘Churdhar’. As a devoted customer, I tried to regain my confidence in the company, but these shoes are a waste of money.

As an experienced trekker, I would never recommend for anyone to try these shoes. Though the sole and pad are comfortable, the front above part is so rigid that it caused wounds on both of my legs after 3 hours of trekking.

The leather has already changed shape after just one trek, and the shoes are not at all water resistant for 6 hours that too in slow rain. Decathlon needs to put more attention into developing its trekking shoe R&D.

Shoes for trekking from Decathlon.

I had purchased this pair from mumbai, Atria Showroom. In the beginning, i was impressed with its material and features, but as i started trying it out at home before the himalayan trek, i obsereved that there is a curve gap inside behind the heel side.

I tried to knot the laces with different tightness but still, while walking, my heel started moving inside in that gap. Tying up shoe evry tight, gives discomfort and the leather is too thick and hard.

So it gives heavy feeling on feet. (This was twice shown to the showroom representative and i also tried adding gel sole inside. But it did not work) High ankle is not comfortable like trek 100 (older version Forclaz 500) and it hurts on the back side over ankle.

It is also wide on upper feet so it doesnt fit on my narrow foot from inside, just as forclaz 500 used to fit perfectly. Still, I have just used it on Pangarchulla Trek (5 to 10 Dec) without additional gel insole, on normal and snowvy terrain and it was not comfortable at all.

Legs started paining. So for my immediate next trek, i am now renting out thr Trek 100 (old Forclaz 500), so i would be able to finish my upcoming trek (12 to 18 dec) without any pain Though the features and material is really good, but I am not satisfied with its performance.

I may recommend this to others but for me, it is not suiting to my feet Would like to change this and try another model of trek 100, if Decathlon is ready to replace after doing one trek in this pair.

Looking for a reply over this. Thank you.