20 Best Shoe For Shin Splints (2023 Updated)

Bought these for the style, returned them for the horrible fit. Let me preface this review by saying I’ve been a Brooks fan for ~4 years and have cycled through the Dyad 10s, the Ghost 12s, and two (2) pairs of Launch 5s.

This is the first time I’ve ever had anythng negative to say about a pair of Brooks shoes, and it really comes down to the horrid lacing system (or lack thereof). Buyer beware, you CANNOT tighten this shoe.

The lacing structure is deisgned such that the sock-like upper and elastic laces are meant to secure your foot, and I found it didn’t even come close. I trialed them Day 1 on a 2-miler and noticed an overall slop as compared to my other shoes with traditional lacing systems and a heel-lock setup.

3 days later I took them on a 3-mile club run, and that was enough to bench them for almost 2 months. In late Sept I gave them one last chance on an 8-mile club run and had severe tightness in both calves for weeks afterward.

Given the inability to immobilize the foot inside the shoe, I felt there was way too much work being done by the foot itself to stabilize, which inevitably transferred up the leg creating just an overall discomfort.

Add to that a general lack of energy return (despite the website description) and these quickly fell out of rotation in favor of Hokas and Nikes with literally hundreds of miles on them. Overall disappointed with the shoe itself, but Brooks obliged me with a full return.

Win some lose some, but I will always have a pair of their shoes somewhere in my training cycle.

These are the PERFECT running shoe. Don’t let the other reviews put you off, I read them and nearly didn’t make a purchase, but I’m so glad that I did. I was worried these wouldn’t be as good as my original Bedlams.

but my worry was misplaced as these are far superior!! Firstly, when I buy new running trainers it usually takes a few runs to break them in, I get a few blisters etc. But with these beauties I didn’t get any of that; from first run they were ultra comfortable and gave me no grief whatsoever.

they immediately felt spot on. Now I know some reviewers have said that these trainers are too narrow and I will admit, if you have a very wide foot these may not be the trainer for you. However I’ve found them to be just right for my standard feet; plenty of room for my feet to expand after a few miles, not so tight they numb my feet, don’t cause any pressure etc.

Also the sown in tongue is something I don’t mind but I can see why some people wouldn’t like it, it makes the shoes tight to get on. But once on, these shoes fit like a glove! What I also love about these trainers is that I’ve always struggled with knee issues when I run, but since wearing these I’ve noticed this problem becoming less and less.

They really do provide the support and stability that I need need running as I don’t have a standard gait and tend to run on the outside of my foot. Thesw trainers are springy without being overly springy, they provide the right amount of ‘bounce’ when running to make them feel comfortable but so I can also ‘feel’ the road too.

Also the sizing is spot on. I’m a UK 5 and decided to opt for a 5. 5 to allow for expansion. This was a good call as they’re very comfy when worn. The only thing thing would say is that these are very much road running trainers or for use on a treadmill.

They’re in no way ideal for trail running or even on slippy/muddy/wet surfaces. The grip is pretty shocking, but as long as you’re aware then you’ll be fine!.

Much tighter fit overall than any other Brooks shoes I’ve worn previously, including the Ravenna 7s and the Adrenaline GTS 17s. I usually wear a size 10 in Brooks, which was the same for these shoes, but the fit is really snug.

I ran after it rained and there’s no grip on the road — felt like I could slip at any moment so I had to be really, really careful (side note: I’d spray a waterproof solution on these before wearing them because they get soaked easily with their very thin material).

This was upsetting because they’re advertised as road-running shoes. The ankle GuideRails take time to break in and were not comfortable at all until my fourth or fifth wear. Even then, the ankle supports don’t really help with my overpronation, which is why I bought these shoes in the first place since I had prior success with Brooks’ support shoes.

The thin material continues right on the inner ankle, which is exactly where previous models of Brooks’ overpronation shoes had a thick material for targeted support. The cushion does feel pretty comfortable when my foot lands, but that’s about the only positive.

I’m not crazy about these at all, even though they are much better looking than all previous models and are definitely the lightest Brooks I’ve worn. Unfortunately I bought these at a DSW so I can’t return them, but I might opt for a different brand in the future, as it seems Brooks changed a LOT with its newest shoe models.

These shoes are truly max cushion shoes. Unlike some other so called max cushion shoes, you can feel the plushness during the run. The ride is really comfortable, yet not so soft that it feels like you’re running on sand.

Although super comfortable, I wouldn’t say they are responsive. They actually feel slower, but that’s OK. I wanted these for recovery. The fit is completely different that the 19. In my normal size of 9 Wide, the 19 was snug, to the point of having to cut slits in the upper around both sides of the ball of my foot and wear super thin socks.

With these modifications, the shoe was comfortable and provided good support up to around 325 miles. After that they became very non responsive. The 20, is actually very wide, even for a wide width. Needed to go back to a cushion sock, custom insoles and a toe bandage on one big toe to eliminate rubbing.

Now that I have the fit issues resolved, the shoes provide a lot of cushion and my knees don’t hurt. If you run on hills, these are probably the best downhill shoes I have ever run in.

I am a Brooks fan, the only running shoe I will wear because of its fit and design that helps with my high arch. The Ghost is my go to shoe and the Glycerine is my long run shoe. When I saw the Glycerine 20’s were coming out, I immediately had to get a pair.

I loved the previous version. I loved to look of the shoe (triple black) and the fit felt like my old Ghosts, almost like a race shoe. So far so good. But then I wore them on my long run. Unlike my previous Glycerine’s, the 20’s had no cushioning or bounce.

It took a toll on the bottom of my feet. I purchased a padded insole to help absorb some of the shock, and tried that out last night, but it had limited impact. It almost feels like I am running in my work dress shoes.

I was told that the shoe takes a while to break in so I will continue wearing them hoping that I start to feel some shock absorbtion. In my case, the impact is felt in the ball of my foot. I hope this changes because I like the fit of these.

Ironically, my new Ghosts feel like my old Glycerines and my new Glycerines feel like my old Ghosts. As of right now, the Glycerine 20’s are not what I had hoped.

A big power walker and previously wore the Glycerin 19’s. I have a range of foot problems including osteoarthritis, and bunions. The Glycerine 20 is simply beautifully comfortable to wear. I feel like I am walking on air and the support is truly phenomenal.

I feel secure when I stride out with the guide rails supporting my every step. I purchased the same size as the Glycerine 19’s although I do think the 20’s are slightly wider. I can not recommend these runners enough especially for ladies in my age group.

I bought the navy and violet and they co-ordinate nicely with my exercise gear. I am waiting in anticipation to see what other colours come out, so so I can alternate my workouts with a second pair. I also tried the Hoka Bondi, but was advised it is imore of a recovery shoe.

Brooks please introduce more colours to the Glycerine 20 range because I am ready go. PS. These runners do not need breaking in.

Great product, at an even better price.

These trainers are very comfy, should be for the price

good service and quailty product

I was skeptical of ordering these shoes at first because I do have continual back pain, but not foot pain and I also have a narrow foot not wide. I was pleasantly surprised to see how well the size medium shoes fit me.

For the first week I walked around my house with them on to give myself time to get use to them in the comfort of my home. They do elevate my arch more than I am use to, but I believe this to be a good thing! I live in flip flops so my feet are constantly flat and causing me severe back pain.

Once I started wearing these shoes out I was hooked! When I went back to my flip flops I instantly had back pain again. I absolutely am sold on this company! I love the fact that they are made here in America as I believe it’s so important to support our local economy.

I was drawn to the fact that the shoes are very stylish since I am 42 years young and desire a functional esthetically pleasing shoe. i am looking forward to purchasing my next shoe with Kuru and it will definitely be a flip flop!.

I was walking 8km on the daily, plus what I did just around the house. My fire was really painful and limited my walks to barely 0. 5km. With my recent Morton’s Neuroma diagnosis, I knew I needed proper foot wear.

I googled shoes specific for my diagnosis and was brought to the Kuru site. I found a pair I liked but hesitated on the price. My wonderful mom said she’d buy them and so I gladly accepted. To wear them around the house while breaking them in was wonderful! So much so, that I feared wearing them out because then I won’t have indoor shoes! This past weekend I finally wore them to the park with my kids.

They are oh so comfy and stylish. I want/need to get another pair for indoors and for outdoor summer weather. Kuru is great in that they make a variety of styles, one (or two or three) to suit even the pickiest of consumers.

My hesitation on ordering more, like I’ve said before, is the price. If they were more affordable, my rating would be 5 out of 5.

This is my second purchase of Kuru’s Atom style within a month. I had a great toe fusion in my right foot almost a year ago and left foot Achilles tendonitis with calcification at the insertion site and bone spurs.

Walking was extremely painful even with high end athletic shoes, ice, heat, and medication. I stumbled upon the Kuru site; this style has completely changed my life. It offers amazing cushioning, support, holds my heel in place and is high enough in the back to not cause pressure on my tendon; the mesh in front allows for the extra room I need.

In my opinion runs true to size with a wide toe box. I did not need a break in period. As a nurse and gym member, I am now able to participate in activities I enjoy, pain free!.

Haven’t worn them. The shoes feel great. However, the NAME blasted across the tongue (which doesn’t show in the picture) and the extra long strings takes away from what would be a very nice walking shoe.

I would love wearing it otherwise. Sorry.

This is my 3rd or 4th walking shoes, I stick to this brand, really great already proven. I was at the park on my walks & a mother & daughter noticed my shoes, I said this pair of shoes are really great for walking.

I’m hoping it won’t be discontinued, should order 1 more. Many thanks, please sign me as L. Holden.

Really disappointed with these Shimano shoes. Bought these for my spin bike and to replace other Shimano shoes that fitted one foot well and not quite the other so thought I’d try these indoor cycling shoes instead of new road shoes.

I really wanted the IC5 but sadly they only come in SPD, not SPD-SL. The IC1 are light but offer practically no support. The insoles are incredibly poor quality. They’re very thin, flat, flimsy and with no arch support.

The closing system consists of a wide strap that leaves the top part of the foot quite loose. I prefer BOA dials by far. The shoes design resembles diving shoes, they have elastic around the ankle that can dig into the skin.

I’m also experiencing hotspots in several places that I didn’t have with my other road shoes. I sized up meaning that they’re quite large in one foot just so I wouldn’t experience pressure on my big toe in my other foot.

I needed to try them with cleats in for a proper fit assessment so sadly I can’t return them. I’ve swapped out the insoles for my other smaller Shimanos as those are firmer and support the arch a lot better.

I’m also trying different sock thicknesses to help with hotspots. All in all, I don’t find this model suitable for indoor cycling. It’s a real shame that other indoor cycling shoes don’t come with a 5 bolt system allowing both SPD and SPD-SL cleats.

The shoes are excellent value for money. Well made and snug fitting. They are not extremely adjustable but are good enough for all indoor cycling (Sprint, RPM, Spin). They fasten using a piece of fabric across your foot and I can see this wearing out over time.

I’ve been using them for a month (4 to 6 classes a week) and the straps are holding up so far so I think they will last a year at least. The shoe is like a tight sock so if you have very broad feet they would be uncomfortable.

Delivery was extremely fast (ordered one day and received the next) so I am very happy.

I was irked when I gave in a bought a peloton only to discover that my cleats and beloved bike shoes were not compatible. I bought these because I can use both delta and spd cleats. They are super comfortable + easy to slip on and off.

I have borderline wide feet. I usually wear a women’s size 7. 5 or 8 for regular shoes and an 8. 5 for running shoes. I bought these in a size 9 (40) and they fit like a dream.

I followed the size chart to the letter, wound up with a size 45. Upon receiving the shoes, the shoe was waaay too long. Like 2 sizes too long. It wasn’t close enough to go “oh well” and deal with. At least an inch and a half of extra shoe.

I bought these specifically due to having the 20% off coupon available and am really bummed to have wasted that savings on these. I obviously haven’t used these enough to know, but I noted that the inside tongue rubs against your foot in a weird way since it subducts under one side and sort of “wraps” your foot.

So there’s only contact with the tongue on one side. At first it was quite painful to wear but that seemed to go away once the shoe “settled”. So that may or may not be a problem. I wondered if that rubbing would cause blisters over time.

My Bontrager shoes’ tongue is a normal design and it feels natural on the foot, but with these it’s like one side of the foot has extra pressure on it due to the design. Could be nothing, I’m not sure.

More use would tell. I bought these to use when commuting and road-biking because i wanted to clip-in, but also needed the ability to walk easily. SPD SL cleats never seemed to offer much benefit and I only use SPD.

These shoes seemed to have a really nice, stiff sole and clipping in/out was smooth even with the added tread. I was really happy with the look, the tread, and the stiffness. It almost felt like walking in a normal shoe.

They did not feel heavy. Such a shame the sizing is so off that I can’t use them. I really want to love these, but we’ll see if I can get the sizing right. I’ll give them another shot with a new size.

These are pretty narrow as well, so if you have wide-feet don’t even bother. They widen up a bit when you wear them but as someone with wider feet i could instantly tell these are very narrow shoes. More narrow than my bontrager cycling shoes of a smaller size.

*Note: on every other website, these shoes come with cleats. REI doesn’t seem to do that, not a dealbreaker but worth noting. Buy cleats if you need them. They did come with neat arch supports you can choose to use or not, i thought that was a nice touch.

To be fair, I am roadie, and I have never been a fan of walking on cleats, which is why I prefer the SPD system. I also think (even for roadies) having little to no sole to walk on is just dumb. Granted I realized one may get more power from other clipless designs.

This shoe is marketed as gravel shoe, but I was looking for a light weight, rigid, high quality shoe for riding on the road. This shoe ticks all the boxes. This is my first shoe with a Boa system, and once I figured out how to adjust it, it is great.

I have about 150 miles logged on the show so far. Very happy with this shoe. I wear US9. 5 and I went with EU44, and the fit is perfect for me. This is for Shimano RX8- Silver.

Like other reviewers mentioned, getting this shoe on for the first time is weird. You really have to pull out the tongue completely to get enough space to get your foot in. After I got them on for the first time, the forefoot felt perfect (and I have a slightly wide foot), but the tongue cut into my ankle on one of my feet.

The shoes come with two arch inserts, one medium and one high. The medium height is already attached, so I swapped it with the high to adjust the fit. Once I had the high insert in place and loosened the boa slightly on the ankle that was irritated, the shoe felt perfect.

I’ve never had such a complicated shoe setup period, which is why I took off a star. Besides that, the shoe is super light (on par with a road shoe) and extremely stiff. The perforations ventilate so well that you can really feel the wind in every pedal stroke.

The first time I tested these, it was Fall in the desert so the ventilation was almost too much in the shade. They’ve been perfect with shoe covers during the winter in the PNW, and I’m sure they’ll make a great summer shoe too.

I bought my usual size and they only fit with thin socks, so if you plan on wearing thick wool socks, size up.

Oh my goodness. I have casually done indoor spin classes for the past few years but always rented shoes as I couldn’t justify buying them when I could just rent for free. Recently I decided I wanted my own shoes and was dead set on getting TIEMs but then decided I wanted something with a little more structure and with a BOA dial since my current studio’s shoes have them and I have found them useful.

I ordered the purple in these shoes and y’all. when I opened the box and saw the color, I was in LOVE. I used them for the first time today and was so pleasantly surprised at how comfy they were. I normally wear a 7.

5-8 (even up to 8. 5 in running shoes). Per the size chart, I ordered a 40, and it fits perfectly! I was actually worried it would be too small when I first put them on with my athletic socks (Balega), which are thicker than regular ones.

Was totally fine during class! Also, I’m used to using delta clips, but these require SPD clips. For some reason, I found them way easier to clip out of the bike with than the delta clips, so that’s also a huge win in my book.

Super happy with my purchase and can’t wait to continue using them!.

My husband and I have been road cycling for roughly 10 years. During that time I have owned 6 pairs of cycling shoes and had just accepted that all cycling shoes are uncomfortable. I saw these in a Backcountry ad and thought I’d give them a go as the price tag was reasonable and I hoped the Boa dial would provide customized adjustment.

They arrived quickly and when I slipped them on I was amazed by how comfy they were and that the Boa dial let me easily adjust them to just the right snugness. Honestly, when we are cycling I am not even aware that I am wearing them.

Another nice feature is their airiness which keeps my feet from sweating and they dry out quickly when we get caught in the rain. I am so in love with these shoes I just ordered a second pair so I will have these for years to come.

Altogether I tried three different indoor bike shoes. However, this shoe won hands down w/a great fit and a good-looking shoe to use w/BOWFLEX C6 INDOOR BIKE! I wear an 8. 5 shoe but needed a 7. 5 in this shoe.

Light shoe, footbed feels great, recessed cleat channels & full rubber soles, dial laces make for EASY AND QUICK ON & OFF! Will only work w/SPD cleats (not included).

I’ve had my new kicks for a few weeks, but feel it’s too soon to write a review Of a love or hate relationship. At first it felt like the arches weren’t placed on my arch properly. Over time that seems to be adjusting.

The size I did go a 1/2 size up. I’m torn. My foot doesn’t slip but they feel big and clunky. With that said, I’m used to topo shoes which are small and light weight, so am I comparing brands or have a true fitting issue!? Not sure, too soon to tell.

I love the tight heel, the color and over all look. The feel. Well, as I’ve said, too soon to write a fair review, so I have it 3 stars until I’ve had time to really wear and adjust to these new kicks.

If I do end up loving it, please make more appealing dress shoes. What is out there now are truly old lady styles and Kuru needs to get with the times.

I have a bad bunion on only my right foot and I’ve been using custom orthotics inside regular sneakers (currently wearing Nike flyknit). I was hoping these shoes would be as advertised in helping relieve foot pain but unfortunately did not.

I have been wearing them for almost 3 weeks now. I am on my feet for 7-8 hours a day for work and I have never felt the kind of calf muscle strain as I have with these shoes. It is stiff and heavy even after breaking into them.

The only positive I can say is that it looks nice, unlike some of the foot corrector or bunion specific shoes. Sad I feel like I have wasted money and these shoes will probably sit in the shoe box until donated.

I bought some Dr. Comfort sneakers back in January, and they are rubbing my feet a little. I thought I’d get this style because I thought it would be better. Alas, it is worse. I bought some stretchers, because it’s not a whole size off.

We’ll see. Besides from that. they look nice.

These shoes are the only ones I have found that work with my Charcot foot and the inserts required for me to walk.

I purchased these for my Mother. She had the same shoe before, and they finally wore out. She wanted the exact same shoe and I found it!!

I purchased a pair approximately a year ago, very comfortable, like wearing a sock and very comfortable. I work in the medical field so obviously important. I bought the same line, but came with different material.

Don’t know why they felt the need to switch, but I’m sure they had their reasons. My toes We’re extremely sore by the end of the day. Way more confining than the original design. Old design, no need for Breakin period, new design, get ready For a few days of discomfort.

Best shoe, of any kind, I have worn in 20 some odd years. Comfortable from the start and only gets better the more you wear them. I run an average of only about 3 miles a day but I walk and am on my feet in these all day long.

No foot pain, no heel pain – just happy feet. I also wear a different Kuru shoe for casually going out and while I like that shoe I still love these more. One gripe with all Kuru: the dang shoelaces are too long for me in both pairs that I have.

I double knot and often triple knot just to take in all the extra length (I barely even tighten the shoes).

I’ve been a long time runner and competitor. I bought these a week ago after using Kayano shoes for years and other brands. I have been on a few runs as a regular runner to assess them and it’s disappointing that they don’t seem as good as they used to be.

They appear as a harsh and uncomfortable shoe. Pro’s: They feel light. My size 11 shoe weights in at 320g ea. The elastic in the Upper construction is excellent that it hugs your foot like a sock and it seems quite breathable.

I like to run my shoes quite snug, so they seem true to size, if slightly narrow in the toe box. Colours a pretty neat. Cons: They’re very rigid in the sole. They’ll become more pliable with use, but currently they create quite a bit of pressure on Toe off.

The Upper and the tongue is very thin. It saves on weight but you feel the laces of you like to cinch your shoes up tight. Cushioning throughout the sole, whilst thick, is not as comfortable as they used to be in years gone by.

Much less Gel in the Heel and midfoot areas, instead relying on high density foams which seem harder and less forgiving. It cuts down weight in sacrifice of impact absorption and you feel it if running on the road if you have poor technique.

Heel cut is just a bit too low to grab the back of the foot securely. This seems to be an Asics thing now, as my last two pairs of Kayanos do the same thing and the Heel foam blows out from rubbing on the heel rather than locking the shoe in place.

For the price of a flagship shoe, they just don’t tick enough boxes in the comfort department anymore to be value for money.

I have worn Asics Gel Nimbus for many years as my go to walking/athletic shoe. It was a lifesaver for me when I had plantar fasciitis in 2012. I have tried to get a new pair the last few years and the last few iterations just did not work for me.

The cushion had changed and toe box seemed shorter and overall the shoe more narrow. One of my feet measures as a B width and the other a C width so I have been looking at a women’s D shoe. I have had to go up another 1/2 size as the shoes seems to be cut shorter than the older styles.

I bought this pair of Nimbus and chose the mens shoe regular width as it just felt a little better than the women’s D width. What I like: The cushion and arch support even though I think the gel feel is far less than say 3 versions ago.

What I don’t like: The way the tongue is sewn in. Not nearly as soft and comfortable as the loose tongue. I preferred the split cushion where the achilles tendon comes down to the heal. Much more comfortable.

The shoe still feels a bit snug and considering trying the men’s wide to see if the toe box is more comfortable and wish the toe box was a bit taller. I spent a long time at the shoe store trying different brands.

I still think my nimbus gel 18 had the best all round shoe cushion for comfort on the upper as well as the sole. I just get the feeling the shoe has been scaled back or cheapened compared to former versions.

Looking at several other brands but in the end the arch support in this shoe really fits mine the best. Sad to pay 150 + for a shoe and feel like I am making do.

As the title states, this is the best and most significant update to the Nimbus line up. It is probably also the best year to year update I’ve seen across many brands. The drop in weight from the Nimbus 23 is significant (35g I believe) and definitely felt as the shoe feels far more balanced, promoting heel strikes to land on their midfoot.

Two standout updates are the inclusion of the new FFBlast+ midsole which adds so much comfort to the ride, and the updated upper where the tongue is now a thin but padded and stretchy tongue. Its a small aspect of the shoe but it looks sleek, and performs its duty far better than the padded and chunky tongues which were more prone to sliding left to right in the older models.

The Nimbus 24 is overall very versatile in that neutral runners like myself can wear them, but they also provide support for pronators and people who need correction in their step. Its especially useful for neutral runners recovering from injuries.

With the reduced weight and sleeker profile, the shoe is also more capable of quicker and longer runs, and absolutely a great experience for everyday running. A worthy addition to my rotation.

You need to try these on – I found them a slightly larger size than other shoes I’ve been trying. Have been to several outdoor clothing shops in recent weeks, trying on countless brands of footwear, and these shoes felt the best, right away, and very comfortable walking in them since.

Undoubtedly well-designed shoes.

TranslateShow in original languageMein erstes Paar vor ca. 5 Jahren hatte noch eine griffige Sohle aus verschiedenen Gummisorten. Das Gummi war weich und somit viel griffiger. Jetzt ist die Sohle leider nur noch ein Hartplastikteil aus einem Stück.

Schade.

TranslateShow in original languageTrage die Schuhe jetzt über ein Jahr und habe sie fast jeden Tag angehabt. Sie sind super bequem und trotz meiner sicherlich nicht immer guten Pflege noch in einem sehr guten Zustand.

Jetzt nach über einem Jahr musste ich einmal die Schnürsenkel tauschen.

This is a great casual shoe. I have wide feet and I still have wiggle room in these shoes. They are comfortable and provide good solid support. If you have a high arch it will not provide great arch support but I think it would still be enough support.

I planned on wearing them inside because I have tile floors throughout my house but I will probably end up wearing them out. I would definitely purchase again.

These are great, comfortable shoes. Great quality and very stylish for todays trends. I bought a pair that have no back as well for house shoes. These I use for lazy days out. Keep in mind that if you are going to wear socks with these, they fit as expected but, if you are going to wear these without socks, I would get a half size smaller as they are a bit loose without socks.

This also depends on how you like you shoes to fit. If you like them floppy loose, then order normal. If you like your shoes to fit normal, (not quite snug but close to snug) then go with the half size smaller.

Either that, or spray the top down with water and let them air dry. The fabrics will shrink a bit and feel a bit tighter.

I love them. Admittedly, I have very wide feet & very high arches, so I can see why people with more “normal” feet would say they’re too wide. I live on tile floors & must wear supportive shoes because my high arches cause too much heel pain.

These fit the bill. Also, I have to agree with those who say these are really shoes, not slippers. Who cares. no pain, & I can wear them to the grocery store! Works for me.

I’m 170lb, 10 to 11 min/mile runner going through marathon training. For my long runs over 18 miles, I’ve tried Nike Invincible Run and Skechers GoRun Maxroad 5, both of which featured widely publicized super foam midsoles, but just didn’t work out due to issues such as blisters, fit, or ride quality.

Nimbus 24 so far proven to have just as good in terms of cushioning, but with superior upper and ride. I’m free of the same problems with those previous shoes. Nimbus 24 has bouncy Blast Plus midsoles, has the right amount of flexibility in the forefoot, while being very consistent in cushioning and ride.

The semi-exposed Trussitc bar provided just the right amount of stability through my gait cycles. The well shaped and padded heel counters provides great comfort. I’m not sold on the stretchy tongue, as I found myself needing to pull it form time to time to maintain the same comfort.

But still, the upper is supremely comfortable, and all of those quality have convinced me to donate the Nike and the Skechers. I highly recommend Nimbus 24. I don’t really have wide feet but have read other reviews about narrower fit, and Wide turned out to be the right choice.

I did a lot of research before buying my Nimbus 23 shoes, with runners at the local harriers and online. I’ve always had problems getting shoes to fit my wide feet and not many shops supply half sizes.

Also I’ve got a lot of miles on the clock and feel it on my knees, shins and feet when sprinting. So I wanted good fit and good shock absorption- research done I chose the N23s. The web site is straight forward and pretty informative in helping you choose the right shoes and set up.

Delivery (from Germany) was fine. Upon opening the box I spotted the size and it was not what I ordered! I tried them on as I thought it was only a size out I might get lucky? Since trying them on I’ve done about 60 miles running and sprinting in them and I totally love them.

No more sore knees/ feet. No blisters or chafing during breaking in period! In fact there was no breaking in period. Turns out I ordered in UK size and of course the shoes arrived in Eu measurement written on the shoes.

I knew what is assumed to be the equivalent and thought they were wrong. Reading some info regards Eu/Uk sizes, turns out they are not directly comparable. Asics had worked out from the info I gave them (wide feet etc) and got it spot on.

Maybe only people who really struggle to get correctly fitting shoes will appreciate what it means to get a 100% fit. It’s actually very painful putting up with something that’s just quite close.

I’ve suffered from plantar fasciitis off and on since 2005. It was a constant from 2005-2010. My custom-made insoles made working on my feet just bearable. When I received my Coral No-Tie shoes from you, I was on the front porch and put them on right then and there.

They felt soooo good even before I stood up, I told my husband I felt like running and he looked at me like I was crazy! (I’ve never been a runner to start with). These days I also have off and on again issues with Achilles Tendonitis and have Haglands deformity.

I’ve also been a lifelong barefoot person whenever I can get away with it. The first couple of weeks after I got these shoes I had noticeable improvement, but still some pain. I realized I was still running around barefoot most of the day (I’m retired).

I made a conscious effort to keep these shoes on when I wasn’t working in the garden. After maybe another week or two I was feeling better, but decided I needed to add the extra arch support pieces that come with the shoe.

I’m doing really, really well now at 7 weeks. Actually I think I was out of most of the pain a week ago, but I had a bad knee flare-up, so I noticed nothing else at the time. I love the slim look too and not having to tie and untie.

Being a women’s size 12, having an athletic shoe that isn’t a big obvious chunk is a huge plus. I only wish it was in the budget to get some sandals also. But now I know what to save for! Thank you!.

My left foot ligaments around my ankle scream all day long. They work too hard to stabilize my left foot which pronates inward and collapses downward at the arch. My pilates instructor, a professional dancer who has ordered Orthofeet shoes for her abused feet, recommended I try Orthofeet shoes.

With vacation coming quickly, I needed a shoe solution. The podiatrist had confirmed my self diagnosis, but other than surgery to move that ligament back in place, doc recommended shoes with strong arch, solid foot bed, and support against pronation.

I took those two tidbits of information and ordered the Orthofeet Black knit stretch shoes. I was heading on vacation at the end of the week, right after breaking in these shoes. They were true to size, of high quality, and looked good with both shorts, and go-out-at-night pants.

It did take 2-3 days for my feet to find their happy place, and for my bones and ligaments to shift back to where they belonged. But then I walked and did low level hiking in Sedona and Grandcanyon in these shoes for the next two weeks.

No more ankle ligament pain! WOW!.

I have a wide foot and a wear a US size 9. I originally ordered the EU size 41 in this shoe. When they arrived they fit great in the width! There was great space in the toe box and not too wide in middle of the foot.

It hugged my feet perfectly. However, it was still too short in length. My toes touched the edge of the shoe. I’m returning them now. It’s $6. 99 to return the shoes but their awesome customer service team sent me a return label for free! And after speaking to customer service, I’ll be reordering them a size up in EU size 42 (which is a US 9.

5) as per their recommendation. My main comparison for this pair of shoes are the shoes that came with my peloton bike. The peloton shoes were incredibly stiff and narrow. I have found these Shimanos to have a softer fabric in the tongue, good width, and the shoe feels slightly lighter in weight than the peloton shoes.

Also to note, other shoes I’ve tried on elsewhere have really stiff fabric so that the tongue of the shoe digs into your ankle – these did not for me! I can’t wait to get the size 42 and start cycling in time for a long winter! :).

I just bought these shoes for year-round commuting and took them back to MEC after less than one use. Even though they’re supposed to be compatible with SPD cleats, I was unable to clip out, as bolts inside the shoes pivoted with my feet as I tried to do so.

Then I read the instructions. It turns out you need an adaptor to use these with SPD cleats. These shoes don’t come with an adaptor, or cleats. The adaptor is not cheap and MEC doesn’t sell it (or mention it in the ad for this shoe).

I was also frustrated by the sizing. I wear a US size 10. 5 and my last bike shoe, a Mavic, was EU size 44. For this shoe I could only fit in to a size 46, which lists as being US size 11. 2. Even size 45 was too small, even though it equates to US size 10.

5. I’ll be trying the MTB equivalent of this shoe with the hope that it is more suitable for SPD cleats and commuting.

Before I bought these, I’d always worn a pair of Converse Chuck T’s for cycling in. I bought a new road bike with ‘proper’ pedals so I had to find a pair of shoes to match. I expected a breaking in period – it wasn’t needed.

Straight out of the box these were comfortable. I’ve been out in them 3 or 4 times now – they do the job really well for the price point. Definitely a good entry level shoe to get used to cleats for the first time.

I would advise before your first ride in them, if you’ve never worn cleats before, 30 mins spent leaning against a wall attaching and undoing from the pedals will be well spent.